Add Row
Add Element
Add Element
cropper
update
Texas Business Now
update
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Texas
    • Business
    • News
    • Insights
    • Innovation
    • Technology
    • Economy
    • El Paso News
    • Austin News
    • Dallas News
    • San Antonio News
    • Ft. Worth News
    • Houston News
    • Business Leader Spotlight
    • Extra News
    • Featured
August 08.2025
3 Minutes Read

Alamo Colleges' Major Restructuring of Faculty Senates Amid New Texas Law

Texas faculty governance changes: Alamo Colleges logo on wooden panel.

Alamo Colleges Faces Major Changes Due to Texas Law

The Alamo Colleges District is gearing up for significant changes that could reshape the voice of faculty within its community colleges. This overhaul comes in response to Texas Senate Bill 37, enacted by the Legislature in May 2025, aiming to gain tighter control over faculty governance. The proposed measures are being carefully scrutinized ahead of a critical board meeting on August 12, where the future of its faculty senate structure will be discussed.

Understanding Senate Bill 37: A New Landscape for Faculty Governance

Senate Bill 37 limits the size of faculty senates to just 60 members total, stripping away the traditional advisory role these bodies held in shaping academic policies and governance. Education advocates are sounding alarms over the implications of this bill, suggesting it shifts decision-making power from educators to political appointees. Critics claim the bill is detrimental to academic integrity, as it undermines professors' abilities to influence curriculum and course evaluations.

The Impact of Proposal: Reduction of Faculty Representation

Currently, Alamo Colleges boasts a faculty senate of 114 voting members across five colleges. Under the new proposal, this number could be reduced significantly to just 25 members—creating an appointed and elected body that may not adequately represent the voices of over 900 full-time faculty members. The intention is to appoint five members from each college, with one member appointed by the chancellor and others elected by their peers. While this represents a more centralized approach, faculty members worry it could dilute their influence on important decisions affecting their work and the educational experience of students.

Reactions From the Faculty: Concerns Over Reduced Influence

Faculty members have voiced strong opposition to these changes. Cindy Katz from the Alamo Colleges United Faculty Senate highlighted during public comments that faculty input is vital to the effective planning and implementation of educational policies. The absence of faculty in discussions surrounding these proposed changes sends a message of exclusion, raising concerns about the future of academic governance within these institutions.

Broader Implications: Education as a Political Tool

The ramifications of SB 37 extend beyond just governance at Alamo Colleges—it poses a broader challenge to the integrity of Texas’s higher education system. The American Association of University Professors cautions that such political control over academic teaching could ultimately lower the quality of education offered in Texas, affecting not just faculty and students but also the state's economic prospects overall. The fear is that by limiting thoughtful academic discourse, Texas may suffer a ripple effect of reduced competitiveness in the job market and diminished healthcare education.

Future of Texas Community Colleges: Navigating Change

As the board meets to discuss these proposals, the question remains of how this will affect the overall landscape of higher education within Texas. With escalating political control over community colleges, the faculty may wrestle further with their diminishing roles, leading to a potential disengagement among educators who feel their voices are sidelined.

Final Thoughts: What This Means for the Future

The ongoing discussions surrounding faculty governance and their voices in shaping higher education are crucial. The outcome of Alamo Colleges’ implementation of Senate Bill 37 will serve as a critical case study for educational institutions across Texas. As changes loom, it is essential for faculty, students, and educational advocates alike to remain united in fighting for inclusive governance that honors diverse voices.

San Antonio News

10 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
10.05.2025

San Antonio's Hispanic-Serving Colleges Face Major Funding Cuts: What’s Next?

Update Federal Cuts Impact San Antonio's Hispanic-Serving CollegesSan Antonio’s educational landscape is witnessing a significant financial upheaval as the U.S. Department of Education has announced the termination of approximately $350 million in federal grants aimed at Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs). This decision has left a dozen local colleges and universities grappling with the impending loss of crucial funding that plays a vital role in student success and institutional growth.HSIs are defined as colleges with a student body that comprises at least 25% Hispanic or Latino students. Despite the misconceptions surrounding these grants—often viewed as benefiting only Hispanic or Latino students—the programs funded through these resources are designed to assist all students. According to Priscilla Camacho, the chief legislative officer at Alamo Colleges District, “These funds are not exclusive; they recognize the distinct student populations we serve, enhancing educational accessibility for everyone.”Understanding the Broader ImplicationsIn Texas alone, there are 112 HSIs, with San Antonio housing 12 of these institutions, including Texas A&M University-San Antonio and the entire Alamo Colleges District. Over the past five years, these institutions have received more than $57 million from at least 21 different grants, significantly contributing to programs focused on increasing enrollment and improving student retention rates across various fields, particularly in STEM.Local leaders are currently assessing the repercussions of these funding cuts. Institutions like Palo Alto College and San Antonio College are already facing cancellations of existing grants, translating to over $1.8 million in lost federal money. Programs such as Project Avance and Project Apoyo, which aim to bolster student momentum and support first-generation college-goers, now confront an uncertain future.Voices of Concern: The Impact on StudentsThe broader implications of these funding cuts extend beyond financial loss; they threaten decades of progress in improving access to education for underrepresented groups. David Mendez, interim chief executive officer at the Hispanic Association of Colleges and Universities (HACU), expressed deep concerns regarding the decision, emphasizing its far-reaching consequences: "These cuts will harm millions of students exploring their potential and pursuing educational opportunities that benefit not only them but entire communities. The efficacy of education for these students hinges on sustained investment.”With ongoing evaluations of existing programs, it remains to be seen how colleges will adapt. While Camacho remains hopeful about reallocating resources to support these initiatives, the loss of dedicated funding will undoubtedly lead to diminished availability of staff and student services.Looking Ahead: Will Educational Equity Be Jeopardized?The Department of Education stated that part of this funding reallocation aims to support developing HSIs and other Minority Serving Institutions, suggesting that some resources may still flow to deserving programs. However, uncertainty remains about how much will be available or allocated to institutions like St. Philip’s College, which holds both HSI and Historically Black College and University (HBCU) designations.This situation brings to the forefront the need for continued advocacy for educational equity. LatinoJustice and HACU have called for the government to reconsider its position, highlighting that cutting funding is equivalent to rolling back years of efforts aimed at fostering important educational access for millions. With the ongoing legal challenges confronting the status of HSIs and their funding mechanisms, the community’s voice is crucial at this juncture.Conclusion: The Importance of Collective ActionIn light of these developments, it’s essential for all stakeholders—including local government, educational leaders, and community advocates—to rally together. Building a consensus around funding needs and supporting institutional advocacy efforts are key to ensuring that the progress made in serving Latino and low-income students is not only sustained but expanded. As this narrative unfolds, staying informed and actively participating in the dialogue will empower communities, ensuring that no student’s educational journey is compromised due to lack of resources.

10.04.2025

CityFest 2025: What the Proposed Downtown Spurs Arena Means for San Antonio

Update CityFest 2025: A Turning Point for San Antonio The Annual CityFest event, taking place in San Antonio, is set to address the much-discussed topic of the proposed downtown Spurs arena, also known as Project Marvel. This initiative could significantly reshape the urban landscape of San Antonio, offering both opportunities and challenges for local businesses and residents. Key Figures and Stakeholders at CityFest This year's CityFest, scheduled for October 21, will feature influential figures including Spurs owner Peter Holt and NBA star Sean Elliot. They will discuss the longstanding impact of the Spurs on the community. Supporting their dialogue, San Antonio’s Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones and Bexar County Judge Peter Sakai will delve into the financial and community implications associated with the arena project. Their insights come just as early voting for a vital venue tax election kicks off on October 20, allowing locals to perhaps have a major say in the future of this initiative. Understanding Prop B: Funding the Future At the heart of the upcoming voting is Proposition B, which would facilitate public funding for the Spurs arena. There is a significant $503 million venue tax election planned for November 4. Voters will also consider Proposition A, focusing on the Spurs' current Eastside site, proposing a shift towards a year-round event district. These decisions represent crucial steps for residents, who will finally weigh in on plans that have circulated extensively among government officials and stakeholders. The Economic Impact: Potential Gains and Risks As detailed in the term sheet signed recently between the city and the Spurs, the financial structure of the new arena project outlines substantial public investment. The Spurs are set to contribute $500 million to the construction costs, while Bexar County's contribution could reach $311 million, contingent on voter approval. Notably, the City of San Antonio would augment this with up to $489 million, funded through municipal bonds and various revenue streams such as lease payments and hotel taxes. This investment raises important questions about the long-term benefits versus risks for taxpayers. If successfully executed, the project aims to stimulate economic growth by creating a vibrant sports and entertainment district that not only revitalizes downtown but also generates jobs and boosts local businesses. Cultural and Community Aspects of Project Marvel The proposed venue, set to rise on the former site of the Institute of Texan Cultures, symbolizes more than just a sporting arena. It encapsulates a vision for a flourishing downtown environment that engages residents and visitors alike. The Spurs have pledged to invest in community benefit agreements totaling $2.5 million annually, aimed at fostering local growth and ensuring equitable access to opportunities arising from the new development. Bringing All Voices to the Table While the Spurs' plans indicate significant infrastructure enhancements, there are also discussions regarding the ramifications of moving the team and the potential impact on Eastside businesses and communities. At CityFest, a panel discussion led by local stakeholders will explore what this transition means for the area. This engagement is critical for ensuring that the voices of residents and small businesses are incorporated into the decision-making process. The Road Ahead: Timeline and Expectations As projections suggest, the design and construction of the new arena could take roughly 57 months. This timeline aligns with the Spurs’ current lease, set to expire at the Frost Bank Center, as both the city and the team aim for an opening that coincides with the start of the 2032-2033 NBA season. However, these timelines depend heavily on the success of upcoming votes and community input. In summary, CityFest 2025 presents a pivotal opportunity for San Antonio residents to engage with plans that may shape the city’s landscape for years to come. As the community prepares to vote, it is imperative for citizens to stay informed and actively participate in discussions about the future of their city. Keep an eye out for more updates as the November elections approach, and prepare to make your voice heard in shaping San Antonio’s sports and entertainment future.

10.03.2025

Will San Antonio's Convention Center Boom Last Amidst Rival Rebuilds?

Update San Antonio’s Convention Center: A New Home for Industry Events San Antonio is currently experiencing a surge in opportunities, driven largely by its Henry B. Gonzalez Convention Center, attracting a plethora of new conventions and events to the vibrant city. The excitement is palpable as events like The Running Event are relocating from Austin due to its ongoing renovations, drawing an impressive crowd of over 5,000 attendees. This annual conference, which focuses on the business side of the running industry, has found San Antonio an ideal venue, boosting its visibility and reputation on the national stage. How Rebuilding Infrastructure is Reshaping the Landscape As major Texas cities invest in their own convention facilities—Austin in a $1.6 billion upgrade and Dallas embarking on a $3.5 billion project—San Antonio finds itself at a pivotal crossroads. The arrival of numerous conventions during this time suggests a temporary boon for the local economy, with an expected impact of over 112,000 hotel room nights and $102 million in revenue. Yet, the city must strategize on retaining these conventions once its rivals reopen their doors. The Economic Ripple Effect of New Conventions Mario Bass, president and CEO of Visit San Antonio, emphasizes the urgency in maximizing the economic benefit from these transient conventions. The conventions not only fill hotel rooms but also invigorate local businesses, from restaurants to entertainment venues. As seen in recent bookings, 126 events anticipated to yield an estimated economic impact of $507 million in 2024 indicate the heavy financial influence of conventions in San Antonio. Building Lasting Relationships with Event Planners Patricia Muzquiz Cantor, director of convention and sports facilities for the city, noted the importance of creating a welcoming environment for convention planners. With community engagement initiatives spearheaded by Visit San Antonio, planners are encouraged to build lasting connections that can strengthen future events in the city. The goal is to transition from a temporary event host to a perpetual destination for major conventions. Future Predictions: Will the Convention Boom Last? While current trends indicate a positive outlook for San Antonio, the city's challenge remains sustaining this momentum. A successful campaign to promote community involvement and high-quality service can lead to retaining conventions even as competitors emerge once more. The blending of excitement brought by events and the need for infrastructure enhancements will dictate San Antonio’s future in the convention market. Risk Factors: The Challenges Ahead San Antonio’s local officials recognize the precariousness of this growth. With larger and more modern facilities on the horizon in Austin and Dallas, maintaining a competitive edge will require ongoing investment and innovation in the convention landscape. There is also the risk that if the city does not maintain its standards for services, attendees may choose to return to the revitalized facilities of nearby cities. Stepping Stones for Sustainable Growth To further increase its potential to retain conventions, San Antonio must enhance not only the convention center but its surrounding areas, creating a more attractive overall experience. Improved public transport links, dining options, and entertainment venues are critical for enticing visitors to choose San Antonio even when others reopen their convention facilities. The future of San Antonio’s convention business hinges on strategic planning and community engagement to ensure the city remains a desirable destination for conventions and events. As we witness this boom, only time will reveal whether San Antonio can adeptly navigate the emerging competitive landscape.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*